<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
  <title>PiNFO</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/" />
  <modified>2006-01-03T02:55:32Z</modified>
  <tagline></tagline>
  <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2006://3</id>
  <generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.2">Movable Type</generator>
  <copyright>Copyright (c) 2006, bunch</copyright>
  <entry>
    <title>Advertising with WinAmp Skins</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/sony/2006/advertising-with-winamp-skins/" />
    <modified>2006-01-03T02:55:32Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-01-02T18:55:23-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2006://3.14952</id>
    <created>2006-01-03T02:55:23Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Product websites these days offer all kinds of downloadable stuff, from desktops and screensavers to IM buddy icons. How come so few of these websites offer customized WinAmp skins? The one pictured above and installed on my computer mimics a pack of Wrigley gum (you can get it here),...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Sony</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<a href="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/353/70/1600/winamp_skin_advertising.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}">
<img alt="" border="0" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/353/70/320/winamp_skin_advertising.jpg" style="cursor: pointer;">
</a>
<br>
<br>Product websites these days offer all kinds of downloadable stuff, from desktops and screensavers to IM buddy icons. How come so few of these websites offer customized WinAmp skins? The one pictured above and installed on my computer mimics a pack of Wrigley gum (you can get it <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=145870">here</a>), but was done by a fan, <a href="http://www.denisbernard.com/">Denis Bernard</a>. Movie publishers seem to be ahead of the rest; there are skins for <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=146612">Narnia</a>, <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=146096">Corpse Bride</a>, <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=145127">Batman Begins</a> and <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=141838">Troy</a> and a few others that seem to be commissioned by the studios.  <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=136704">Pepsi</a> and <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=128681">Powerade</a> seem to get it, too. Most of other branded skins - very good ones, too - are made by fans. There are skins styled after <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=146259">iPod nano</a>, <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=146071">Pioneer</a>, <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=146192">Sony</a>, <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=145873">Puma</a>, <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=144554">Pizza Hut</a>, <a href="http://www.winamp.com/skins/details.php?id=139639">Nokia</a>.<br>
<br>I think this by far beats advertising through <a href="http://adverlab.blogspot.com/2005/08/advertising-with-firefox-skins.html">browser skinning</a>.<br>
<br>WinAmp's latest 5.1 version has been downloaded over 4.5 million times. That's only one version for one operating system (Windows) on one site <a href="http://www.download.com/Winamp-Full/3000-2167_4-10434059.html?tag=lst-0-1">Downloads.com</a>.  The first WinAmp was released in 1997. The install base for this thing should be huge by now.</div>

            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Apple, Google Had Good 2005</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/microsoft/2006/apple-google-had-good-2005/" />
    <modified>2006-01-03T02:52:48Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-01-02T18:52:15-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2006://3.14931</id>
    <created>2006-01-03T02:52:15Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Apple, I am betting is going to have a good if not great 2006. The reason I say that is because the company did rather well in 2005. While most of the world focused on the booming sales of iPod, Apple&amp;#8217;s core business of selling computers also had a...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Microsoft</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <p>Apple, <a href="http://gigaom.com/2005/12/26/apple-2006/">I am betting is going to have a good if not great 2006</a>. The reason I say that is because the company did rather well in 2005. While most of the world focused on the booming sales of iPod, Apple&#8217;s core business of selling computers also had a record year. <a href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/default.aspx">Market Share website</a> shows some really revealing data on Apple&#8217;s improved fortunes in 2005. </p>

<p>From January 2005 to December 2005, <a href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=5">the web users using Mac OS-X increased </a>from 3.41% to 4.35%. (Windows XP kept taking market share away from older Windows versions - 2000, 98, and ME). <a href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=3">In the browser category</a>, Safari users went from 1.66% to 3.07%, nearly doubling their user base. These two metrics when taken together show that Apple&#8217;s user base might be on an upswing. In the browser arena, Firefox started 2005 with 5.59% and ended the year with 9.57%; taking market share away from IE, which showed a downward trend. </p>

<p>Other highlights of 2005:</p>

<ol>
<li><a href="http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?qprid=4">Google&#8217;s share of the search market</a> increased from 39.68% to 48.09%.</li>
<li><a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=YHOO" class="quote" onmouseover="sqttShowQuote( 'YHOO' )">Yahoo<span class="YHOO" ></span></a>&#8217;s Mojo may not be translating into search market share. <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=YHOO" class="quote" onmouseover="sqttShowQuote( 'YHOO' )">Yahoo<span class="YHOO" ></span></a> websites total went down from 17.28% in January 2005 to 13.02%. </li>
<li>MSN had similar issues as well. </li>
</ol>

<p><em>How they collect data: &#8230; from the browsers of site visitors to our exclusive on demand network of small to medium enterprise live stats customers.  The sample size for these sites is more than 40,000 urls and growing&#8230;.</em></p>

<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/OmMalik?a=gsA5gM"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/OmMalik?i=gsA5gM" border="0"></a></p>
<div class="feedflare"><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/OmMalik?a=SFAF3TVR"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/OmMalik?i=SFAF3TVR" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/OmMalik?a=3xvNSDcv"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/OmMalik?i=3xvNSDcv" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/OmMalik?a=UUpvf65t"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/OmMalik?i=UUpvf65t" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/OmMalik?a=Zd19wvR2"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/OmMalik?i=Zd19wvR2" border="0"></a></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/OmMalik?g=109"/>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Yahoo to launch reality TV series online</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/yahoo/2006/yahoo-to-launch-reality-tv-series-online/" />
    <modified>2006-01-03T02:52:48Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-01-02T18:51:38-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2006://3.14932</id>
    <created>2006-01-03T02:51:38Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Xeni Jardin: Snip from SF Chronicle article: Terry Semel, the former movie studio chief who now leads Yahoo Inc., is back in show business. His Web portal has filmed a pilot for a reality series called &quot;Wow House&quot; that will be broadcast online within the next few months. (...)...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Yahoo</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <strong>Xeni Jardin</strong>:
Snip from <em>SF Chronicle </em>article:

<blockquote>Terry Semel, the former movie studio chief who now leads Yahoo Inc., is back in show business. His Web portal has filmed a pilot for a reality series called "Wow House" that will be broadcast online within the next few months.<p>
(...) "Wow House," Yahoo's new show, will be broadcast in an area for technology coverage that the company is carving out on its Web site. Families participating in the show compete to outfit their homes with the latest electronics, such as theater systems, high-definition televisions and stereos. The family that wins, as voted by viewers, will keep the merchandise.</p></blockquote>
<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/01/01/BUGJCGDH4T1.DTL">nks, Kourosh).
<p>
Previously on Boing Boing:
<br><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-op-media9oct09,0,4639637.story">Battle Blogging for Profit</a>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/boingboing/iBag?a=ureaPU"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/boingboing/iBag?i=ureaPU" border="0"></a></p></p></a>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Starz To Launch Portable Movie Download Service</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/microsoft/2006/starz-to-launch-portable-movie-download-service/" />
    <modified>2006-01-03T02:52:49Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-01-02T18:51:32-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2006://3.14933</id>
    <created>2006-01-03T02:51:32Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> : Not deterred by the rather lackluster response to its online subscription movie service Starz Ticket, the cable TV co is launching is launching a new movie download service that allows consumers to view full-length studio films, concerts and TV shows on portable devices powered by Microsoft software. It...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Microsoft</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    : <img alt="starzvongo1.gif" src="http://www.paidcontent.org/stories/images/starzvongo1.gif" width="91" height="38" align="right" />
Not deterred by the rather lackluster response to its online subscription movie service <a href="http://www.starzticket.com/">Starz Ticket</a>, the cable TV co is launching is launching a new movie download service that allows consumers to view full-length studio films, concerts and TV shows on portable devices powered by Microsoft software. It will be announced at CES.
<br>The service, dubbed "<strong>Vongo</strong>," is available for a monthly subscription of $9.99 and will eventually include more than 1,000 movies, short films and other programs.
<br>Starz said its Vongo service will also be a key feature of the Sony Connect video service set to launch later this year.
<br>Some features:
<br>-- Users will be able to download as many films as they want each month to up to three devices
<br>-- A smaller number of films will be available several months sooner for a pay-per-view fee of $3.99.
<br>-- Subscribers will also be able to watch a <strong>live, streaming video feed of the Starz TV channel</strong>.
<br>The <a href="http://www.vongo.com/">site should be here</a>, it seems, though it is not live yet...
<br><strong>Related</strong>:
<br>-- <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2005_11_09.shtml#052309">Starz's Online Movie Service Costs</a>
<br>-- <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/pc/arch/2005_04_04.shtml#013028">NCTA: Starz: Movie Download Service Isn't Cannibalizing Video Subs</a>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Care About Internet Stocks?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com//2006/care-about-internet-stocks/" />
    <modified>2006-01-03T02:52:49Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-01-02T18:51:29-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2006://3.14934</id>
    <created>2006-01-03T02:51:29Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Then read Burnham&apos;s posts covering the year that was, 2005. Start here, then go here (best performing), here (worst) and here (IPOs)........</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <p>
Then read Burnham's posts covering the year that was, 2005. Start <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/BurnhamsBeat?m=80">here</a>, then go <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/BurnhamsBeat?m=77">here </a>(best performing), <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/BurnhamsBeat?m=78">here</a> (worst) and <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/BurnhamsBeat?m=79">here</a> (IPOs).....
</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/JohnBattellesSearchblog?a=Hw4FfJ"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/JohnBattellesSearchblog?i=Hw4FfJ" border="0"></a></p>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The 50 Best Robots Ever</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com//2006/the-50-best-robots-ever/" />
    <modified>2006-01-03T02:52:50Z</modified>
    <issued>2006-01-02T18:51:23-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2006://3.14935</id>
    <created>2006-01-03T02:51:23Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Wired offers a list. &quot;They&apos;re exploring the deep sea and distant planets. They&apos;re saving lives in the operating room and on the battlefield. They&apos;re transforming factory floors and filmmaking.&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <p><a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.01/robots.html">Wired</a> offers a list. "They're exploring the deep sea and distant planets. They're saving lives in the operating room and on the battlefield. They're transforming factory floors and filmmaking."</p>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Web 2.0 Companies I Couldn’t Live Without</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/google/2005/web-20-companies-i-couldnat-live-without/" />
    <modified>2005-12-30T17:44:22Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-12-30T09:44:11-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2005://3.14895</id>
    <created>2005-12-30T17:44:11Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> There have been numerous 2005 &amp;#8220;best of&amp;#8221; and 2006 &amp;#8220;predictions&amp;#8221; posts over the last few weeks as the year comes to an end. I&amp;#8217;m not going to write one of those. Giving out &amp;#8220;best of&amp;#8221; awards seems presumptuous to me, given that I&amp;#8217;ve been blogging all of six months....</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Google</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <p>There have been numerous 2005 &#8220;best of&#8221; and 2006 &#8220;predictions&#8221; posts over the last few weeks as the year comes to an end. I&#8217;m not going to write one of those. Giving out &#8220;best of&#8221; awards seems presumptuous to me, given that I&#8217;ve been blogging all of six months. And while predictions are fun, they aren&#8217;t all that useful in the end.</p>
<p>What I do want to write about as I reminisce about the year ending in a couple of days are the Web 2.0 companies that I love and use every day.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tested over a thousand products this year, and have written about hundreds. And while some of the companies I write about get very positive reviews, I find that the only true test of the value of a product is its staying power: do I continue to use the product, and maybe even pay for it, as the days and months go by?</p>
<p>So for those of you that are curious, here is a short list of the companies that have held my attention, and that I would not choose to live without on the web:</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.bloglines.com">Bloglines</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/bloglinessmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />I have a love/hate relationship with Bloglines, but they&#8217;ve recently <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/20/three-cheers-for-bloglines/">improved performance</a> dramatically, and I really like that I can see the number of subscribers for each feed. This was the hardest one to include on the list, but at the end of the day I couldn&#8217;t leave them off.</p>
<h2><a href="http://del.icio.us">Del.icio.us</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/delicioussmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />I use Del.icio.us multiple times every day to store and retrieve bookmarks. I freely admit that there are better solutions out there and I may very well switch to <a href="http://www.shadows.com">one</a> of them in the near future, but you have to hand it to Del.icio.us for inventing the social bookmark phenomenon.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.feedburner.com">FeedBurner</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/feedburnersmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />I love the statistics Feedburner provides on feed readership and has lots of <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/13/feedburner-integrates-web-services-into-feeds/">advanced features</a> that are important to me. And despite what I&#8217;ve <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/07/is-feedburner-pushing-the-envelope-on-trust/">written in the past</a>, I know and trust the FeedBurner team. I just wish they&#8217;d get rid of the advertisement on my feed page. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<h2><a href="http://www.flickr.com">Flickr</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/flickrsmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />I enjoy Flickr more and more every day. I like seeing what my friends are up to based on the photos they upload as well as getting comments from others on my pictures. And I am starting to go back and upload old sets of photos from years ago. Flickr is just perfect.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.measuremap.com">Measuremap</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/measuremapsmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />The Measure Map blog analytics tool created by Adaptive Path gives me incredible insight into who is looking at what on TechCrunch. They need to deal with the speed issue for larger blogs though (it takes minutes sometimes to pull up stats, or just breaks).</p>
<h2><a href="http://tech.memeorandum.com">Memeorandum</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/memeorandumsmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />Memeorandum is how I keep up on the blogosphere when I don&#8217;t have time to read all of my feeds. It has also changed what I blog about, and how. Memeorandum is a cultural phenomenon.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.netvibes.com">Netvibes</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/netvibessmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />Yeah, there are a <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/18/yep-one-more-ajax-desktop-pageflakes/">lot of Ajax desktops</a> out there, but Netvibes seems to stay ahead of the pack on functionality. The flickr stuff is great. Plus, how can I not love a service that includes TechCrunch as a default feed? <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<h2><a href="http://www.omnidrive.com.au">Omnidrive</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/omnidrivesmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />I&#8217;ve been waiting for <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/12/28/omnidrive-online-storage-perfection/">something like this</a> forever. I forsee a day when a service like Omnidrive comes packaged with a new PC, or is offered alongside web email solutions.  I&#8217;ve only had it for a few days, but I&#8217;m smitten. And fair disclosure: there are some awesome competitors out there, too, that I am just starting to look at.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.pandora.com">Pandora</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/pandorasmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />I listen to Pandora whenever I write - sometimes for hours a day. I&#8217;ve discovered countless new artists from it.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.skype.com">Skype</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/skypesmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />What can I say? Along with Vonage, Skype keeps my phone bills down to next to nothing, and it is an integral part of my everyday business and personal life. I would trade application sharing for the new video feature in a heartbeat, however.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.technorati.com">Technorati</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/technoratismall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />I use it more than Google. No one has launched anything better, yet. And they&#8217;ve made great progress in search speed over the latter half of the year.</p>
<h2><a href="http://www.wordpress.org">Wordpress</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/wordpresssmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />I love Wordpress. Actually, let me rephrase that statement: I love Wordpress 1.5. Version 2.0 makes me want to throw my laptop out of the window. But it is an amazing piece of software, and all of my blogs run on it.</p>
<h2><a href="http://maps.yahoo.com/beta">Yahoo Maps</a></h2>
<p><img style="float: right" src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/12/yahoomapssmall10.jpg'class="shot2" alt="" />I use Yahoo Maps because it allows multi-point driving instructions, something none of the others offer yet. This was incredibly useful when I had to attend three or four holiday parties on the same evening.</p>

<div class="feedflare"><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Techcrunch?a=FTMZSFW6"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Techcrunch?i=FTMZSFW6" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Techcrunch?a=msCv0qdY"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Techcrunch?i=msCv0qdY" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Techcrunch?a=QTcR9Eah"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Techcrunch?i=QTcR9Eah" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Techcrunch?a=zggjieZS"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Techcrunch?i=zggjieZS" border="0"></a> <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Techcrunch?a=iz3pTMXL"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/Techcrunch?i=iz3pTMXL" border="0"></a></div><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Techcrunch?g=510"/>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Jon Fine tells papers to &apos;steal from Google&apos;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/google/2005/jon-fine-tells-papers-to-steal-from-google/" />
    <modified>2005-12-30T17:44:23Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-12-30T09:43:57-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2005://3.14896</id>
    <created>2005-12-30T17:43:57Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> BusinessWeek&apos;s Jon Fine urges newspapers to &quot;steal from Google&quot; and cut off their rival&apos;s oxygen....</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Google</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    BusinessWeek's Jon Fine urges newspapers to "steal from Google" and cut off their rival's oxygen.<img src="http://rss.businessweek.com/bw_rss/blogspotting?g=134"/>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Can You Spot the RFID Spychip?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com//2005/can-you-spot-the-rfid-spychip/" />
    <modified>2005-12-30T17:44:23Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-12-30T09:43:42-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2005://3.14897</id>
    <created>2005-12-30T17:43:42Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Katherine Albrecht put together a fearless photo exposé on the use of RFID tracking chips at Wal-Mart, and on various products like printers and TVs. She goes on to show how customers are electronically frisked on their way out of the store. All of this is &quot;for your protection&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <p><img alt="spychips.jpg" src="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/spychips.jpg" width="500" height="375" class="center border"/><br />
Katherine Albrecht put together a fearless photo exposé on the use of RFID tracking chips at Wal-Mart, and on various products like printers and TVs. She goes on to show how customers are electronically frisked on their way out of the store. All of this is "for your protection" of course.</p>

<p>Seeing these sticker-RFIDs does make me take another look at the Dorkbot dude who implanted an RFID chip in his hand and wonder, why on earth didn't he simply use a sticker?</p>

<p><a HREF="http://www.spychips.com/protest/walmart/spychip-slideshow/index.html">Photos of Item-Level RFID Tagging Wal-Mart Super Center, Dallas, Texas October 15, 2005</a> [Spychips (via Digg)]</p>
&nbsp;<br /><a href="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/can-you-spot-the-rfid-spychip-145864.php">Comment on this post</a>
<br />Related: <a href="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/more-xm-innovation-voice-control-145820.php">More XM Innovation, Voice Control</a><br />Related: <a href="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/bumpin-thumpin-luggage-145723.php">Bumpin', Thumpin' Luggage</a><br />Related: <a href="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/gadgets/aurora-palettethe-magical-curtain-145667.php">Aurora Palette&mdash;The Magical Curtain</a>
<p><a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?a=DOSj6D"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?i=DOSj6D" border="0"></a></p>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>RSS Icon &amp; The Feed Theory</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com//2005/rss-icon-the-feed-theory/" />
    <modified>2005-12-30T17:44:24Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-12-30T09:43:39-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2005://3.14898</id>
    <created>2005-12-30T17:43:39Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> What that orange icon really means and does? The unified feed theory defined by The uber geeks....</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <p>What that orange icon really means and does? <a href="http://theubergeeks.net/2005/12/30/feed-theory/">The unified feed theory defined by The uber geeks</a>. </p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/OmMalik?a=61hPbr"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/OmMalik?i=61hPbr" border="0"></a></p><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/OmMalik?g=99"/>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Click Fraud Competes With SPAM For Title Of &quot;Most Heinous&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/google/2005/click-fraud-competes-with-spam-for-title-of-most-heinous/" />
    <modified>2005-12-30T17:44:24Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-12-30T09:42:53-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2005://3.14899</id>
    <created>2005-12-30T17:42:53Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Wired: Pay-per-click is the fastest-growing segment of all advertising, reports the Interactive Advertising Bureau. Last year, Yahoo! alone ran more than 250 million individual listings, according to Michael Egan, the company&apos;s search-marketing director of content strategy. Yahoo! doesn&apos;t break out PPC earnings separately in its financial statements, but Goldman...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Google</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <p><a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.01/fraud.html">Wired</a>: Pay-per-click is the fastest-growing segment of all advertising, reports the Interactive Advertising Bureau. Last year, Yahoo! alone ran more than 250 million individual listings, according to Michael Egan, the company's search-marketing director of content strategy. Yahoo! doesn't break out PPC earnings separately in its financial statements, but Goldman Sachs analyst Anthony Noto believes that keyword advertising accounted for about half of the company's estimated $3.7 billion in revenue for 2005. PPC is even more lucrative for Google. According to Noto, Google will end 2005 with $6.1 billion in revenue. About 99 percent of that revenue comes from keyword ads (over 56 percent from AdWords, according to the company's most recent quarterly financial statement, and 43 percent from AdSense), making Google a bigger recipient of ad dollars than any television network or newspaper chain. All of which is to say that little blue text links, a type of advertising that barely existed five years ago, are poised to become the single most important form of marketing in the US - unless click fraud ruins it.</p>

<p>If that occurs, the consequences will be felt throughout the Net. By splitting revenue with the sites that host the ads, search engines have become, in effect, the Internet's venture capitalists, funding the content that attracts people to the computer screen. Unlike the VCs who backed the boom-era Internet, search engines now provide revenue to thousands of wildly diverse sites at little up-front cost to them - PPC advertising is one of the few income sources available to bloggers, for instance. If rampant click fraud overwhelms the system, it will muffle the Internet's fabulous cacophony of voices.</p>
<p><map name="google_ad_map_i4Dp6vikGS6TRZ7VVFGMGQ3XmaI_"><area shape="rect" href="http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/imgclick/i4Dp6vikGS6TRZ7VVFGMGQ3XmaI_?pos=0" coords="1,2,367,28"/><area shape="rect" href="http://services.google.com/feedback/abg" coords="384,10,453,23"/></area></area></map><img usemap="#google_ad_map_i4Dp6vikGS6TRZ7VVFGMGQ3XmaI_" border="0" src="http://imageads.googleadservices.com/pagead/ads?format=468x30_aff_img&client=ca-pub-8594383005282184&channel=6872911001&output=png&cuid=i4Dp6vikGS6TRZ7VVFGMGQ3XmaI_&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.adpulp.com%2Farchives%2F2005%2F12%2Fclick_fraud_com.php"/></p>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Behind Doc Ock&apos;s Bar - the Octopus Tap</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com//2005/behind-doc-ocks-bar-the-octopus-tap/" />
    <modified>2005-12-20T19:37:15Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-12-20T11:37:06-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2005://3.14586</id>
    <created>2005-12-20T19:37:06Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> As I recall from my heady college days, having a 1-to-1 keg to tap ratio was usually a bad idea. Someone would do a kegstand and then you&apos;d get a dollop of partially-digested Doritos on the top of the keg, leading to the dreaded party foul. The Octopus Tap...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <p><img alt="feat_product.gif" src="http://us.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/feat_product.gif" width="322" height="291" class="center border">As I recall from my heady college days, having a 1-to-1 keg to tap ratio was usually a bad idea. Someone would do a kegstand and then you'd get a dollop of partially-digested Doritos on the top of the keg, leading to the dreaded party foul. The Octopus Tap hopes to change all that. It consists of up to three taps&mdash;not quite octo, but tripus would sound weird&mdash;that can squirt out the brass monkey with reckless abandon. BONUS: Frats&mdash;You can even assign different taps to the pledges and make them drink urine afore tasting the sweet nectar of barley and hops.</p>

<p><a HREF="http://www.octopustap.com/">Product Page</a> [OctopusTap]</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?a=TIeUBc"><img src="http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/gizmodo/full?i=TIeUBc" border="0"></a></p>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>NYT: Google Will Put Graphical Ads on Main Site</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/google/2005/nyt-google-will-put-graphical-ads-on-main-site/" />
    <modified>2005-12-20T19:37:15Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-12-20T11:36:51-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2005://3.14587</id>
    <created>2005-12-20T19:36:51Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> My, my, my....</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Google</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <p>
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/20/technology/20google.html?adxnnl=1&amp;adxnnlx=1135094568-d9wUgzUAX4UVOXp/HZBsiw">My, my, my. </a>
</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/JohnBattellesSearchblog?a=WKw8st"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/JohnBattellesSearchblog?i=WKw8st" border="0"></a></p>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Who&apos;s heard of KsanLab?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com//2005/whos-heard-of-ksanlab/" />
    <modified>2005-12-20T19:37:15Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-12-20T10:34:06-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2005://3.14588</id>
    <created>2005-12-20T18:34:06Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Me neither. But now you have. Check out their website and this really cool &quot;Virtual Tour&quot; of their office, which according to their note to me, &quot;catches the spirit of KsanLab and its people&quot; and &quot;demonstrates the great potential of virtual worlds to transfer both informational and emotional messages&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <p><a href="http://www.ksanlab.com/showcase/virttour/"><img class="image-full" title="Ksan" alt="Ksan" src="http://jaffejuice.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/ksan.jpg" border="0" style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 5px 5px 0px" /></a>Me neither. But now you have. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.ksanlab.com/">Check out their website </a>and this really <a href="http://www.ksanlab.com/showcase/virttour/">cool "Virtual Tour"</a> of their office, which according to their note to me, "catches the spirit of KsanLab and its people" and "demonstrates the great potential of virtual worlds to transfer both informational and emotional messages"</p>

<p>Now compare this experience to the corporate websites of the "other" agencies out there. </p>

<p>Pray tell, who would you want to do business with?</p>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>So, One Year Later, How&apos;d I Do?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/microsoft/2005/so-one-year-later-howd-i-do/" />
    <modified>2005-12-20T19:37:16Z</modified>
    <issued>2005-12-19T21:26:36-08:00</issued>
    <id>tag:pinfo.pinacol.com,2005://3.14589</id>
    <created>2005-12-20T05:26:36Z</created>
    <summary type="text/plain"> Each year I make predictions. Each year, I review them and see how I did. Then, I make some more. Alright then. Here&apos;s my 2004 predictions post, written in late December, 2004. As much as I might wince at the one or two clunkers, I&apos;d say I did pretty...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>bunch</name>
      <url>http://www.kylebunch.org</url>
      <email>kyle@pinacol.com</email>
    </author>
    <dc:subject>Microsoft</dc:subject>
    <content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pinfo.pinacol.com/">
      <![CDATA[    <p>
<a href="http://battellemedia.com/images/crystal%20ball-tm.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://battellemedia.com/images/crystal%20ball-tm.jpg','popup','width=96+20,height=100+20,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=yes,left=0,top=0');return false"><img src="http://battellemedia.com/images/crystal%20ball-tm-tm.jpg" height="100" width="96" align="left" border="1" hspace="6" vspace="4" alt="Crystal Ball-Tm" title="" longdesc="" /></a>Each year I make predictions. Each year, I review them and see how I did. Then, I make some more.
</p><p>
Alright then. <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001151.php">Here's my 2004 predictions</a> post, written in late December, 2004. As much as I might wince at the one or two clunkers, I'd say I did pretty well on most. Here's running commentary on each - original in <em>itals</em>, my comments in <strong>bold</strong>:
</p><p>
<em>1. We will have a goat rodeo of sorts in the blogging/micropublishing/RSS world as commercial interests push into what many consider a "pure medium." I've seen this movie before, and it ends OK. But it's important that the debate be full throated, and so far it looks to be shaping up that way. I'm already seeing these forces at work over at Boing Boing, and I am sure they will continue. We'll all work on figuring out ways to stick to our principles and get paid at the same time, however, I expect that things might get more contentious before they get better, and 2005 may be a more fractious year in the blogosphere as we evolve through this process.</em>
</p><p>
<strong>We've sure had debates about taking advertising this past year, and we've had </strong><strong><a href="http://www.scripting.com/2005/11/10.html#When:10:57:25PM">important folks</a></strong><strong> who have sworn they'd never read a feed if it had  an ad in it (update: Dave contacted me and said he does read feeds with ads in them, but sure doesn't like em..). And we've had a lot of speculation about how much blogs </strong><strong><a href="http://gigaom.com/2005/11/28/the-return-of-monetized-eyeballs/">are worth</a></strong><strong> given all those eyeballs paying attention to them. I think I got this mostly right, but the debate is not at full throat quite yet.
<br /></strong>
</p><p>
2. <em>Along those lines, things will not go as swimmingly as we'd like with regard to "monetization." As the majors get into the space and start throwing around their weight and lucre, some folks will make bad decisions, and others will freeze and make no decisions at all. It will get harder to innovate before it gets easier. We'll all be surprised by the lack of what we consider "progress" in the RSS/Blogging world, and expectations of major publishing revenues will not materialize as quickly as perhaps we think they should. However, we'll in fact be making huge strides in understanding the path forward, it just won't seem like it. By the end of the year, the world will begin to realize that "blogs" are in fact an extraordinarily heterogeneous ecosystem comprised of scores, if not hundreds, of different "types" of sites.
</em></p><p>rong><em>While I have not written about this much, I have to say, this is proving very, very true, in particular the parts about "it will get harder to innovate before it gets easier." Now that I'm deep into development with FM, and have been in conversation with loads of folks at partners, peers, and the Big Guys, I am convinced there is *a lot* of work  left to do to create robust platforms for blog publishing. Not the publishing software, mind you, though that can always get better. But the professional tools like statistics, analytics, and monetization platforms. We're really, really early on all those fronts. One such place is RSS, where the majors have all made significant announcements, but it is entirely unclear what the business model will be for the content creators who drive value in the first place.</em>
</p><p>
3. <em>There will be two to five major new sites that emerge from "nowhere" to become major cultural influencers along the lines of the political bloggers of 2004. One of them will be sold to a major publisher/aggregator for what seems like a large sum of money, driving the abovementioned #2 and #1.
</em></p><p>rong><em>Well, hello </em><strong><em><a href="http://gigaom.com/2005/08/06/why-murdoch-bought-myspace/">MySpace</a></em></strong><strong><em>, </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002103.php">del.icio.us</a></em></strong><strong><em>, </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001245.php">Bloglines</a></em></strong><strong><em>, </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001339.php">flickr</a></em></strong><strong><em>, and on and on....</em></strong>
</p><p>
4.<em> Meanwhile, the long tail will become the talk of the "old line" media world. To capture some of that value, we'll see a slew of deals and new publishing projects from the established brands that seek to capture the idea of community journalism, affiliate commerce sales, and collaborative content creation.</em>
</p><p>
<strong>I think Chris has managed a major media coup - he owns the idea of The Long Tail in mainstream culture, and *before* his book has come out. That's the </strong><strong><a href="http://longtail.typepad.com/the_long_tail/">power of a good blog</a></strong> <strong>(and </strong><strong><em>Wired</em></strong><strong>, of course). Meanwhile, the scramble to get into the citizen journalism and/or "user generated content" game has grown into an all out race, and the dire predictions from all sides about how the newspaper and even the cable business are threatened or near death now come daily.
<br /></strong>
<br />5.<em> Google will do something major with Blogger. I really have no idea what, but it's overdue. Six Apart will grow quickly but face a crisis in its implementation as its core users demand more features that are "unbloglike" like customer databases and robust publishing support tools. This (and other things) may drive Six Apart or one of its competitors into the arms of Yahoo or AOL or even - gasp - Quark or Adobe or Marcomedia.
<br /></em>
<br /><strong>OK, I am simply, entirely wrong on this one. Unless you count </strong><strong><a href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/1234000717063627/">splogs</a></strong><strong> as "something major."
<br /></strong><em>
<br />6. Ask will continue to consolidate traffic by buying smaller search sites.</em>
</p><p>
<strong><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001557.php">True</a></strong><strong>, but then again, I didn't predict </strong><strong><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001336.php">IAC buying Ask</a></strong><strong>, did I?
<br /></strong>
</p><p>
7.<em> Yahoo and Google will both test systems that combine local merchant inventory information with search, so that merchants can use search as a direct sales channel. By the end of the year, there will be no question that the search companies are in direct competition with the ecommerce companies, but it won't matter - there's room for them all. Paul Ford will continue to get droves of readers to his related, and very prescient, three year old post on how Google takes over the world.
<br /></em>
<br /><strong>I think I nailed this one. Local merchant info is now </strong><strong><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002059.php">uploadable to Google</a></strong><strong> and </strong><strong><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001805.php">Yahoo local</a></strong><strong>, as well as </strong><strong><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002033.php">Base</a></strong><strong>. And when Base launched, </strong><strong><a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;ct=res&amp;cd=1&amp;url=http%3A//www.ftrain.com/google_takes_all.html&amp;ei=eF-nQ7WlKYTkacXH3YoH&amp;sig2=_xuOMdiwJT79DBJYS4szQw">Ford's</a></strong><strong> traffic went way up, I'm told....</strong>
</p><p>
8. <em>Microsoft will lose search share before they gain it back later in the year when the integration of MSN search starts to scale with new versions of Office and IE . Net net, however, MSFT will gain total in total search sessions from last year, and its technology will get much, much better.
<br /></em><strong>
<br />Recent figures show that my timing was off by a bit, MSFT is </strong><strong><a href="http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.san&amp;s=37484&amp;Nid=17158&amp;p=229680">losing share right now</a></strong><strong>, but will gain it back soon, I'd wager. And the technology *is* getting much better.
<br /></strong>
</p><p>
9<em>. Firefox will near 15% of total browser share. Firefox faithful will wonder why it's not much much higher. But MSFT will release a very good upgrade of IE, see #8.
<br /></em>
<br /><strong>According to the latest figures I have seen, </strong><strong><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=173402282">Firefox is right at about 15% market share in the US</a></strong> <strong>(10% worldwide). And MSFT planned a major IE update this year, but it's late (no kidding...). IE 7 is </strong><strong><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=174904339">due next quarter</a></strong><strong>.
<br /></strong>
<br />10. <em>A third party platform player with major economies of scale (ie eBay or Amazon) will release a search related innovation that blows everyone's mind, and has everyone buzzing about how it redefines what's possible in search.</em>
<br /><strong>
<br />Thanks Amazon, for that </strong><strong><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002115.php">Alexa move last week</a></strong><strong>, you made me look damn smart, and just in time.</strong>
</p><p>
11. <em>The China question will become a critical issue to the search community. Defining the China question will in itself be a major task of 2005. How do search companies go in without being "evil"? Is the tradeoff worth it?</em>
</p><p>
<strong>Well, this sure came up </strong><strong><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001846.php">big time for Yahoo</a></strong><strong> this year, and Google and Microsoft had a </strong><strong><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001839.php">major China problem</a></strong><strong>, but it was about hiring, not ethics. Google </strong><strong><a href="http://chinadigitaltimes.net/2005/05/john_battelle_g.php">opened an office</a></strong><strong> and went into business. So far, no hue, no cry.
<br /></strong>
<br />12. <em>By the end of the year, there will be no question that search is a media business, and that the major players in search are major players in the content business.</em>
</p><p>
<strong>I think I gave myself a softball on this one...it was true then, it's true now...
<br /></strong>
<br />13. Something major will finally happen at Tivo. We all hope that it's a sale to Apple, but if it is a sale, it will more likely be to Comcast or DirecTv.
</p><p>
<strong>Not a sale (yet), but </strong><strong><a href="http://news.com.com/TiVo,+Comcast+reach+DVR+deal/2100-1041_3-5616961.html"> deals</a></strong><strong> with </strong><strong><a href="http://www.imediaconnection.com/news/5436.asp">both</a></strong><strong> that helped stabilize the company and give it some lift.
<br /></strong>
</p><p>
14. All year, Apple will be rumored to launch a video iPod, but it won't - it's still too early. By the end of 2005, we will just be starting to see traction in the video over IP market and its connection to search. Google will introduce Video search at some point in 05, but it will stay in Labs.
</p><p>
<strong>Holy sh*t, I was plain wrong on </strong><strong><a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=apple+video+ipod&amp;sourceid=mozilla-search&amp;start=0&amp;start=0&amp;ie=utf-8&amp;oe=utf-8&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official">Apple</a></strong><strong>, but right on </strong><strong><a href="http://video.google.com/">Google Video</a></strong><strong> - and yes, it's in </strong><strong><a href="http://labs.google.com/">Labs</a></strong><strong>.
<br /></strong>
<br />15.<em> Mobile will finally be plugged into the web in a way that makes sense for the average user and a major mobile innovation - the kind that makes us all say - Jeez that was obvious - will occur. At the core of this innovation will be the concept of search. The outlines of such an innovation: it'll be a way for mobile users to gather the unstructured data they leverage every day while talking on the phone and make it useful to their personal web (including email and RSS, in particular). And it will be a business that looks and feels like a Web 2.0 business - leveraging iterative web development practices, open APIs, and innovation in assembly - that makes the leap. (More on this when I start posting again).
</em></p><p>rong><em>I think I was right in spirit - upon some reflection and with history's calm glance, this past year will go down as the year that mobile became the story on the Web. But I was ahead of the market in the rest of my prediction - this will take more time than I thought. I'm pretty sure the "Web 2.0" business I mention in the prediction exists right now, I just don't know its name, yet. Do you? Then let us know!
<br /></em><em>
<br />16. Perhaps most recklessly...I will finish my book. The reviews will be mixed, as my attempt to satisfy both the exacting audience of Searchbloggers and the more general audience of a major trade hardcover may fall flat. Many will say I tried to do too much, others that I didn't do nearly enough (how's that for airing my deepest fears in public?!). However, I'll be happy with the effort, and the book will do OK, thanks mainly to the support of this community. So, ahead of time, thanks for your support this past year. I learned more from this process than I ever thought possible, and I owe it all to you, who grace my site with your time and input.
<br /></em><strong><em>
<br />Wow. </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001242.php">I did finish it.</a></em></strong><strong><em> And I'm pleased to say that I was largely wrong about the reviews - they've been really, really gratifying. As have sales, personal emails, my conversations with folks about the book, your kind words on this site....I'm going to have to stop now, I'm making myself all weepy. I want to do it again. Imagine that!
<br /></em></strong><em>
<br />17. Lastly, I will be involved in starting a new business in the field of media and technology. It will start very slowly, and I'll screw up as much as I possibly can in the early stages, before imposing it on the rest of the world. Hopefully, you'll all be there to keep me honest as I try to figure out a few ideas I've been simmering for the past year or so.
<br /></em><strong><em>
<br />I got this one right </em></strong><strong><em><a href="http://fmpub.net/archives/2005/06/fm_financing.php">also</a></em></strong><strong><em>, but I rigged that one - I knew I wanted to start FM, and now that I'm deep into it, I have to say it's just as thrilling and terrifying as the book, but more so - this time, I've got many fellow travelers, including, again, all of you. Thank you for a great year, and here's to the next one (and yes, my predictions for 2006 are coming soon....)
</em></strong></p><p><strong><em><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/001150.php">this same post </a></em></strong><strong><em>(how I did on my 2003 predictions) from 2004</em></strong>
</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/JohnBattellesSearchblog?a=j8iAHg"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/JohnBattellesSearchblog?i=j8iAHg" border="0"></a></p>
            ]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>